🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.